[ SECRET POST #2888 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2888 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 060 secrets from Secret Submission Post #413.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 (rape) - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Is there any instance where YA fiction is better than critically acclaimed classics?

[(Anonymous)]

I am interpreting this as "is there any instance of a work of fiction classified as YA that is, in your opinion, better than some work of fiction commonly identified as a classic and praised by people who consider themselves critics". In which case yes, duh. If on the other hand you meant to say "better than every work of fiction commonly identified" etc., then no, duh. If only because if the YA book is considered good, you can probably find people claiming it is a critically acclaimed classic, and it can't very well be better than itself.