[ SECRET POST #2888 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2888 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 060 secrets from Secret Submission Post #413.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 (rape) - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Is there any instance where YA fiction is better than critically acclaimed classics?

[dethtoll]

The problem with most YA fiction is that a lot of it tends to be very tropey and share a lot of the same characteristics from book to book as well as contemporary popular media aimed at children. This isn't bad in and of itself, but that it's so common in YA fiction shows a lack of creativity.

I'd still rather read it than 95% of so-called 'classical literature.'

Re: Is there any instance where YA fiction is better than critically acclaimed classics?

[(Anonymous)]

It's not a lack of creativity. It's a lack of publishers willing to publish books that step outside of what they think will sell.