[ SECRET POST #2888 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2888 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 060 secrets from Secret Submission Post #413.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 (rape) - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Is there any instance where YA fiction is better than critically acclaimed classics?

[(Anonymous)]

Critically acclaimed classics then to be very racist / misogynist / homophobic. YA, while lower quality, tends to be much more inclusive and accepting.

So I'd say all instances.

Re: Is there any instance where YA fiction is better than critically acclaimed classics?

[(Anonymous)]

You have a funny definition of "better", assuming you're using the word "quality" correctly.

Re: Is there any instance where YA fiction is better than critically acclaimed classics?

[(Anonymous)]

A lot of generalizations in that statement, but then this is essentially a joke thread, so have at it.

Re: Is there any instance where YA fiction is better than critically acclaimed classics?

[(Anonymous)]

And a lot of classics are a product of the times in which they were written.