case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-11-29 04:03 pm

[ SECRET POST #2888 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2888 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 060 secrets from Secret Submission Post #413.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 (rape) - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Alternative to the Bechdel Test?

(Anonymous) 2014-11-30 01:38 am (UTC)(link)
My personal test is if there is no good story based reason for a character to be male, then they should not be male. Sick of the "Default" being men, and sadly I find so few things that meet my criteria.

Re: Alternative to the Bechdel Test?

(Anonymous) 2014-11-30 02:40 am (UTC)(link)
You must have a lot of fun being too virtuous to enjoy anything.

Re: Alternative to the Bechdel Test?

(Anonymous) 2014-11-30 03:27 am (UTC)(link)
What do you consider a good reason? Previous canon/adaptation? Career more likely to have a male majority? Or is "need for man-candy" good enough?

Re: Alternative to the Bechdel Test?

(Anonymous) 2014-11-30 03:36 am (UTC)(link)
is need for woman-candy a good enough reason for a character to be female

(serious question, i'm curious your answer)