case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-12-04 06:03 pm

[ SECRET POST #2893 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2893 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 012 secrets from Secret Submission Post #413.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Fanartists, at least, are attention whores when they do this IMO

(Anonymous) 2014-12-05 08:49 pm (UTC)(link)
It's kind of interesting that you would say this considering you work in science. From what I know from writing papers and talking to professors who publish their work, regardless of how you may personally feel toward your work and getting recognition, the act of writing an article demands that you source all of the work from which you have based your hypothesis on. I highly doubt that your original question came from thin air. And people will have to credit your article in turn when they cite your work for future studies, so it's a little ironic that you would use your scientific background to compare to the entertainment industry. Crediting work is an imperative part of publishing your findings.