case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-12-05 06:28 pm

[ SECRET POST #2894 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2894 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06. [ SPOILERS for Over the Garden Wall ]



__________________________________________________



07. [ WARNING for rape ]



__________________________________________________



08. [ WARNING for rape ]




__________________________________________________



09. [ WARNING for eating disorders ]



__________________________________________________



10. [ WARNING for non-con/rape ]
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #413.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Sex/beauty symbols who aren't thin

(Anonymous) 2014-12-06 12:29 am (UTC)(link)
I think the "tiny waist" rule applies there. She just has big boobs.

Re: Sex/beauty symbols who aren't thin

(Anonymous) 2014-12-06 12:31 am (UTC)(link)
Otoh, they really are quite excellent breasts

Re: Sex/beauty symbols who aren't thin

(Anonymous) 2014-12-06 12:32 am (UTC)(link)
She has a bmi of 25 which is just over the normal range (18.5 to 24.9). So I wouldn't call her thin. I looked up her height and weight and got Height - 1.71 m, Weight -73 kg which is a bmi of 25. She's not fat or anything (I'm not trying to say she's big) but I don't think you can reasonably call her thin either.

Re: Sex/beauty symbols who aren't thin

(Anonymous) 2014-12-06 12:36 am (UTC)(link)
You can call her thin when she has such a large amount of boob. I have large boobs myself, and even when I was very sick with mono for about three weeks and dropped an alarming amount of weight, I was still above my recommended BMI. The boobs matter.

Also, she's a size 10, and the average dress size in the USA is a 14. She's thin.

Re: Sex/beauty symbols who aren't thin

(Anonymous) 2014-12-06 12:39 am (UTC)(link)
>the average dress size in the USA
>in the USA

That's not a good comparison to make, as the US has a much higher proportion of overweight people than most of the rest of the world. The US average is not "average"

Re: Sex/beauty symbols who aren't thin

(Anonymous) 2014-12-06 12:43 am (UTC)(link)
She's a citizen of the USA, so it's a perfectly valid statement. She is skinny compared to the average woman in her country, thus, skinny.

Re: Sex/beauty symbols who aren't thin

(Anonymous) 2014-12-06 12:44 am (UTC)(link)
That's not how it works anon

If everyone in the US were 500 pounds and someone is 499, that doesn't make that person skinny, it makes everyone overweight because you're comparing them to everyone being 500 pounds

Wtf are you on?

You can be non-thin without being "skinny" if the average person is already overweight which in the US they are

Re: Sex/beauty symbols who aren't thin

(Anonymous) 2014-12-06 12:47 am (UTC)(link)
That doesn't really work. Skinny doesn't mean "smaller than average" -- some of its synonyms are "scrawny" and "bony" and "waiflike" which Christina Hendricks is demonstrably NOT. Also, just because that the population of the US is -- medically -- on average overweight, you can't call someone who is normal weight skinny.

If everyone weighed 400 pounds on average, someone who only weighed 300 pounds wouldn't be skinny. Smaller than average? Yeah. But not skinny.

Re: Sex/beauty symbols who aren't thin

(Anonymous) 2014-12-06 12:40 am (UTC)(link)
She's not fat or big. But she's not thin either. The average American woman is overweight after all. At 5'4" and 166.2 pounds, you have a bmi of 28.5 which is overweight. And while on an individual level the bmi may not be great, it's very good for looking at the average population.

Look at this picture: http://i744.photobucket.com/albums/xx85/96bearcat/More/Christina-Hendricks-3.jpg

She has full, thick thighs -- not fat, but you can't look at those legs and tell me they're skinny or thin either.

Re: Sex/beauty symbols who aren't thin

(Anonymous) 2014-12-06 12:45 am (UTC)(link)
nayrt

TIL the average American woman weighs more than I do, holy shit.

Re: Sex/beauty symbols who aren't thin

(Anonymous) 2014-12-06 12:46 am (UTC)(link)
She's not even close to 5'4''. Her height is officially 5'7'', and the weight varies between 70kg and 73kg depending on the source. You can call her thin because of her proportions--she has a classic hourglass figure, but her waist is pretty small.

Re: Sex/beauty symbols who aren't thin

(Anonymous) 2014-12-06 12:50 am (UTC)(link)
I know that. I listed her height and weight a bit earlier on. But that being said, she is NORMAL weight. She's on the higher end of the bmi scale because of her breasts but even then she is nowhere near skinny or thin. She's a normal, healthy weight.

She is a sex/beauty symbol who isn't thin. She's not bigger or fat either. But that doesn't automatically make her thin.

Re: Sex/beauty symbols who aren't thin

(Anonymous) 2014-12-06 12:50 am (UTC)(link)
nayrt

No, the average american woman is 5'4" and 166 lbs. On average, they are overweight. To take that as a benchmark for skinniness is plain wrong.

Re: Sex/beauty symbols who aren't thin

(Anonymous) 2014-12-06 12:47 am (UTC)(link)
A 10 is significantly larger than the average Hollywood actress, though.

Re: Sex/beauty symbols who aren't thin

(Anonymous) 2014-12-06 12:39 am (UTC)(link)
She has a 30'' waist. That's thin.

Re: Sex/beauty symbols who aren't thin

(Anonymous) 2014-12-06 12:41 am (UTC)(link)
No, that's normal. She's not fat or big but she fits the parameters because she's not thin or skinny either.

Re: Sex/beauty symbols who aren't thin

(Anonymous) 2014-12-06 12:51 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, no. She may technically fit the parameters, but don't even pretend she's the sort of example the OP was asking for. When you have to look up the numbers to prove she's overweight, that's a sign.

Re: Sex/beauty symbols who aren't thin

(Anonymous) 2014-12-06 12:56 am (UTC)(link)
But OP didn't ask for sex/beauty symbols that were overweight. OP asked for such symbols who are NOT THIN. Which Christina Hendricks fits -- she's normal-sized and healthy, clearly not overweight, but she is by no means thin.

She's a sex/beauty symbol that is not thin

Re: Sex/beauty symbols who aren't thin

(Anonymous) 2014-12-06 01:22 am (UTC)(link)
Except they said overweight in the next paragraph. They obviously meant overweight people, don't be obtuse.

Re: Sex/beauty symbols who aren't thin

(Anonymous) 2014-12-06 01:25 am (UTC)(link)
I don't think it's being obtuse to point out that not being overweight doesn't automatically make one skinny or thin either.

It isn't an either or proposition -- you aren't either overweight or skinny. There's a range in between.

Re: Sex/beauty symbols who aren't thin

(Anonymous) 2014-12-06 01:51 am (UTC)(link)
... a 30" waist is not thin, anon. I used to have one when I was a size 12/14. That's not thin.