[ SECRET POST #2896 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2896 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 052 secrets from Secret Submission Post #414.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Further to yesterday's thread

[(Anonymous)]

nope. we are not doing this. fuck off.

Re: Further to yesterday's thread

[(Anonymous)]

Doing what?

Re: Further to yesterday's thread

[(Anonymous)]

Fuck Off.

Re: Further to yesterday's thread

[(Anonymous)]

I'm honestly asking. It's not like there's any wank in the thread as it stands, so what's the problem?

Re: Further to yesterday's thread

[(Anonymous)]

Go for a long walk on a short quay.

Re: Further to yesterday's thread

[(Anonymous)]

well, jeez louise

Re: Further to yesterday's thread

[(Anonymous)]

we're not doing a "lets all criticize feminism" thread.

Re: Further to yesterday's thread

[(Anonymous)]

There aren't any posts critical of feminism ITT tho

Re: Further to yesterday's thread

[(Anonymous)]

the whole topic is critical of feminism. can you really not see this?

Re: Further to yesterday's thread

[(Anonymous)]

DA

It's probably the OP of yesterday's thread posting and complimenting their own idea as interesting, since nobody agreed with them yesterday.

Re: Further to yesterday's thread

[(Anonymous)]

OP of yesterday's thread gave an opinion?

IIRC they didn't ask for agreement or disagreement.

Re: Further to yesterday's thread

[(Anonymous)]

AYRT

I mean the OP of the idea proposed as "interesting." This reads so hard as a "nobody gave me attention yesterday so I'll bring it up again and pretend it's amazing teehee it's not my idea tho"

Re: Further to yesterday's thread

[(Anonymous)]

I don't know, they never said 'amazing' they said it was 'interesting', which in my experience is usually a euphemism for absurd or crock-of-shit

Re: Further to yesterday's thread

[(Anonymous)]

If you meant absurd or crock of shit, you'd dismiss it and move on, not start a whole new thread.

Re: Further to yesterday's thread

[(Anonymous)]

You mean how no-one talkes about the absurd crockoshit that the wbcc spout? No, we ignore boring opinions, idiotic opinions are fun.

Re: Further to yesterday's thread

[(Anonymous)]

It's not critical of feminism if everyone then says "No, it's not alienating men."

I mean, I'm not the OP, maybe they did do it as an excuse for a big feminism-bashing party, but it seems like a pretty sincere question to me.

Re: Further to yesterday's thread

[(Anonymous)]

It's not bad to be critical of feminism. There are things about feminism that should be criticized (such as the tendency for it to ignore intersectionality).

There's a difference between talking about the problems with something and dismissing it. Feminism shouldn't be dismissed, because it's necessary, but that doesn't mean no one can or should be critical of aspects of it or of how it's sometimes applied.