Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-12-07 03:47 pm
[ SECRET POST #2896 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2896 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 052 secrets from Secret Submission Post #414.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
You're talking about the difference between "critique" and "hate" as if there is a clear, unequivocal line that both the fans and the critics will agree on. While it's easy to say that it's hate when someone who accuses all Alice/Bob fangirls of being pathetic losers, for a lot of fans, any critique of their favorite ship is going to feel personal.
Which is why separate fannish spaces is a good thing.
I was being a bit flippant when I suggested "alice_bob_rules" and "alice_bob_sucks" but even if I'd called the hypothetical critique community "alice_bob_crit" or something like that, it's not going to make the Alice/Bob fans happy.
But having that community will give the people who really cannot stand the fact that Alice the alien infiltrator is using Bob for his government contacts a place where they can talk freely about it, and the people who want to squee about how Alice and Bob's relationship transcends the boundaries of planetary origin can have a community for that, too.
That doesn't guarantee peaceful co-existence in the main AliceBobAdvntrs comm, and the moderators might have to step in to lock posts that got out of hand. But at least it means that both of the opposing sides have their opposing sides to retreat to (or their rooms to be sent to, if you prefer that metaphor) rather than stepping on each other's toes in a common tag.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-12-08 06:45 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-12-08 08:35 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-12-08 09:02 am (UTC)(link)no subject
While not every comm had moderators that were willing to lay down the law and keep the community wank-free, there were mechanisms in place that allowed mods to do that.
Nobody owns Tumblr tags. Nobody is making sure that they are used "correctly," and in fact, there is no universal definition of what the "correct" use of a tag is. It's kind of a Wild West situation. Or Dodge City, maybe, with two factions declaring that "this tag ain't big enough for the both of us."
(Which would make LJ/DW comms ... Metropolis, I guess?)