case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-12-13 03:38 pm

[ SECRET POST #2902 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2902 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 058 secrets from Secret Submission Post #415.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
ill_omened: (Default)

Re: Face sitting and Female ejeculation

[personal profile] ill_omened 2014-12-13 10:25 pm (UTC)(link)
It's not against the law to consume. It's against the law to produce, because they've altered legislation that was originally aimed at video pornography from eleven years ago to cover the internet.

The reason that it covers what it does is because they don't believe that female ejaculation is a thing and that it's urine, and the rest is banning suffocation and violence.

I mean it's still terrible legislation, and an extension of our regressive approach to freedom of expression.

Re: Face sitting and Female ejeculation

(Anonymous) 2014-12-13 10:29 pm (UTC)(link)
the rest is banning suffocation and violence.

That's why they banned deepthroating, then? Oh, hang about, they didn't. that's still 100% A-OK.
ill_omened: (Default)

Re: Face sitting and Female ejeculation

[personal profile] ill_omened 2014-12-13 10:38 pm (UTC)(link)
Is it?

I don't know enough about the specifics of british porn produced under this legislation. Although I guess the argument would be that deppthroat lacks the time and complete envelopment of facesitting.

Re: Face sitting and Female ejeculation

(Anonymous) 2014-12-13 10:29 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah when I read that I was really confused. They banned any sort of urination in pornography, which includes female ejaculation. idgi.

Re: Face sitting and Female ejeculation

(Anonymous) 2014-12-13 10:37 pm (UTC)(link)
Suffocation, but no deep throating? Jeeze

Re: Face sitting and Female ejeculation

(Anonymous) 2014-12-13 10:39 pm (UTC)(link)
Welllll the female ejaculation you see in porn isn't real. It usually isn't pee but is often just water pushed out when they "orgasm".

Re: Face sitting and Female ejeculation

(Anonymous) 2014-12-13 10:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Sorry you live in such a backwards, uncivilized country, mate
dethtoll: (Default)

Re: Face sitting and Female ejeculation

[personal profile] dethtoll 2014-12-13 11:17 pm (UTC)(link)
This is why I always laugh when my British friends are like WHY DOES YOUR COUNTRY PERMIT HATE SPEECH?!?!?!?! And they always act like our emphasis on free speech is just so WEIRD and almost as barbaric as our gun culture.
ill_omened: (Default)

Re: Face sitting and Female ejeculation

[personal profile] ill_omened 2014-12-13 11:46 pm (UTC)(link)
It's literally the best thing about your country.

Constantly let down by just how pathetic the ECHR is. For all intents and purposes the 'you have a right to freedom of speech' is treated as 'I mean free speech is good and all when it's nice speech, but we didn't want to protect bad speech, let's not go crazy here'.

Re: Face sitting and Female ejeculation

(Anonymous) 2014-12-14 12:38 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah. You don't need protection for speech everyone likes, that's pretty pointless.