[ SECRET POST #2904 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2904 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 040 secrets from Secret Submission Post #415.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Which is for men. And gay porn still, IME, largely treats the other man as an equal.

But you've shown yourself to be fairly sexist, from what I've seen.

[(Anonymous)]

NA

But it seems like your problem here is with objectification being from the man's point of view instead of the woman's point of view, rather than with objectification as a phenomenon itself.

Would that be correct?

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah? Because that's how you'd make it equal. That's a huge point to sexism. That a whole lot of everything is geared toward men. Even when it comes to homosexual porn, I have yet to find lesbian porn that appeals to actual lesbians first.

And that's what people usually mean when they complain about objectification being unequal.

[anonymous4]

From what you've seen of what?

Why would the fact that it's aimed at men make any difference?

My experience is limited to very 'soft' images supplied for an icontest I used to participate in but, personally, I found a lot of the men very objectified, especially the ones in disturbingly child-like poses.