case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-12-15 06:42 pm

[ SECRET POST #2904 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2904 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 040 secrets from Secret Submission Post #415.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2014-12-16 10:07 am (UTC)(link)
No, no, no! "Sexism" is treating a person differently from another person bacause of their gender/sex, or assuming that they have different capabilities. Sexualizing women while not sexualizing men is, therefore, sexist. Sexualizing women differently than sexualizing men can be, arguably, sexist (except if it's a difference that boils down to them having different sexual organs). There is no "sexist way to sexualize" one counterpart without including the way the other is. Making your statement redundant.
dragonimp: (Default)

[personal profile] dragonimp 2014-12-16 04:26 pm (UTC)(link)
poor word choice on my part then.

(Anonymous) 2014-12-18 05:49 am (UTC)(link)
so sexist is exclusive for women? That's creepy as f***.

Now, who's desperate then?