case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-12-17 06:51 pm

[ SECRET POST #2906 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2906 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 021 secrets from Secret Submission Post #415.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Fandom grudges thread

(Anonymous) 2014-12-18 12:52 am (UTC)(link)
This one BNF in one of my main fandoms that runs a graphics blog and for some reason has emerged as some sort of guru about the series. But they seem more interested in pushing their own biases onto the canon and passing it as irrefutable analysis, and act like their responses and theories are better than others/the only possible theory.

It's silly, but they honestly piss me off more than they should

Re: Fandom grudges thread

(Anonymous) 2014-12-18 01:01 am (UTC)(link)
What kind of theories and biases do they have, anon?

Re: Fandom grudges thread

(Anonymous) 2014-12-18 01:04 am (UTC)(link)
This sounds FAR too familiar to me. What fandom is it?

Re: Fandom grudges thread

(Anonymous) 2014-12-18 01:27 am (UTC)(link)
Hmm, I'll just say it's a manga fandom, because while it's not a small fandom, it would be kinda easy to find out who I'm talking about. But I wouldn't be surprised if this type of attitude matches several BNFs.