Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-12-17 06:51 pm
[ SECRET POST #2906 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2906 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 021 secrets from Secret Submission Post #415.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: thoughts on case's modding ability
Not to mention maintaining distance from getting too personally involved with the community that it changes/grows on its own. Not that mods shouldn't be active within their comm, but half the time mod drama happens is because of how they engage their members (if not ridiculous mods drama). The reason it's so easy to see people say these idealising things about ours is because he mods like a boss.
btw, IP logging shouldn't matter to you unless you actually think case is going to somehow endanger you because he figured out you enjoy being a sycophant, or maybe a dick rod, on multpiple posts (anon, puppet, not puppet, etc.).
And the few folk who have been banned definitely deserved to be. No one is going to be sad about the absence of crude and repetitive assholes.
Re: thoughts on case's modding ability
Re: thoughts on case's modding ability
I'm also assuming bringreligiontothewamwams, though I'm not too sure if they just abruptly stopped.
That you even have to think if there ever were bans or warnings shows how lax this place is, and that it's waaaaay far off from anyone's claim that it's stiff. And you still can't ban anonymous anyway, which is where the most mean-spirited stuff is coming from.
Re: thoughts on case's modding ability
(Anonymous) 2014-12-18 06:17 am (UTC)(link)Re: thoughts on case's modding ability
If we're being spooky nostalgic about fs bogeymen though, homette saw I was from Edmonton in a friending meme, and joked about how I must be enjoying the awful winter. To this day I wonder if she was my sole local fser, and whether we ever passed each other on a sidewalk. OooooOOOOoooo. /shiver
(Though seriously where are my Yegs at. Don't tell me we only produce weirdos on fs, and I am the sole exception :u)
Re: thoughts on case's modding ability
(Anonymous) 2014-12-18 06:50 am (UTC)(link)Re: thoughts on case's modding ability
is it not on the pleb dicktionary known as urbandictionary? Well it means "let's be real" when I've used it. Have I been unintentionally addressing folk as hopeless losers without knowing it?
Re: thoughts on case's modding ability
Re: thoughts on case's modding ability
got any threads?
I doubt wamwams was banned. They were annoying, but we've had way more annoying named users here than them. I'd bet they just got bored and left.
And I agree! We're overall pretty lax.
Re: thoughts on case's modding ability
Re: thoughts on case's modding ability