Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-12-22 07:08 pm
[ SECRET POST #2911 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2911 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 045 secrets from Secret Submission Post #416.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 (same words, different image) - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-12-23 12:27 am (UTC)(link)I don't much care for him in BTVS, because he's really one-note by comparison, a dreamy guy for Buffy to moon over - and yes, that romantic arc not surprisingly does seem very high-schoolish, which is appropriate for her, but not so much for him. IMO.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-12-23 12:29 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-12-23 12:49 am (UTC)(link)Except Buffy's a way stronger character than Bella. But still.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-12-23 01:11 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-12-23 03:22 am (UTC)(link)I actually like the idea that while they may be attracted to each other, they are not actually a good fit and don't work. I don't think BTVS did that out of actual writing choice, but because Angel and BTVS ended up being on different networks.
And (going slightly OT now) I hate with a fiery passion the "omg, I love you so much but we can't be together." It crops up in some many shows, probably as a way of building angst and romantic tension, but it drives me batty. I always scream at the TV, "if you can't be together, then DON'T."
So yeah, I hear ya!
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-12-23 04:40 am (UTC)(link)But even without the conclusive end, Angel having his own show just felt like it saved Buffy from turning into a complete romance cliche (not that Buffy would have to go in that direction, but even good writers can't always resist it.) It was really refreshing and nice to see them as individual characters.
"omg, I love you so much but we can't be together." It crops up in some many shows, probably as a way of building angst and romantic tension, but it drives me batty. I always scream at the TV, "if you can't be together, then DON'T."
ME TOO. Especially because writers tend to come up with all sorts of ridiculous ways for the couple to not be together, and the longer it goes on the more incompatible the pair ends up being. I never find it romantic and by the time those sorts finally get together (if they do) I'm pretty much bored of the characters along with their "romance."
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-12-27 05:16 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-12-23 05:16 am (UTC)(link)no subject
"The appearances of these villains are connected to "Twilight", the enigmatic Big Bad of the season, a masked person who views the expanded ranks of Slayers as a threat to humanity and wants to destroy them, and bring about an end to all magic on Earth."
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-12-23 05:54 am (UTC)(link)Huh, I just read a brief synopsis on Wikipedia. Interesting-ish. And yet, still so much Buffy relationship drama. Xander? Seriously? And Angel and Spike. If only they could have worked Riley and Parker in there too, it might have been a full reunion.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-12-23 06:17 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-12-23 06:30 am (UTC)(link)no subject
I don't know if the use of the code name Twilight was deliberate or accidental, but either way it seems apropos.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-12-23 05:38 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-12-23 06:32 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-12-23 07:57 pm (UTC)(link)