case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-12-27 04:05 pm

[ SECRET POST #2916 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2916 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 050 secrets from Secret Submission Post #417.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 (second time) - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2014-12-27 10:52 pm (UTC)(link)
Now they look cheap and cliche, but didn't they start the trend of simple covers like that? Maybe I spend too much in the fantasy section but I thought they stood out a bit for not having any photos/paintings of people with windswept hair, shiny armor and swords and fainting women.
dreemyweird: (austere)

[personal profile] dreemyweird 2014-12-27 11:24 pm (UTC)(link)
Ngl, they might've done. But I don't dislike the fact that they're minimalist, I dislike the fact that they're so pointless and sort of just... pretty for the purpose of being pretty. Plus, the symbols they use are very tired.

(Anonymous) 2014-12-28 04:37 am (UTC)(link)
DA Well, they were a lot less tired when the books first came out. I didn't love the covers, but the fact that they were fairly minimalist was very eye catching. It was a nice change of pace from the usual "two people posed in an angsty yet anatomically questionable position" cliche.