[ SECRET POST #2916 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2916 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 050 secrets from Secret Submission Post #417.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 (second time) - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

They aren't. Every editor misses some things, and every editor is weak in some areas and strong in others. Any of us who've been at it for a while know that - it's why there are different branches of editing, for Pete's sake.

[(Anonymous)]

DA

Agreed. My pro-published work typically goes through at least three sets of editors -- the main content edit, and at least a couple of rounds of proofing/copyediting once that's complete.

OP's friend sounds like they're offering the final stage without the previous foundations. If that's what people want, and if they're aware of what they're getting then that's fine, but I'd hesitate to call it 'editing'.