Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-12-27 04:05 pm
[ SECRET POST #2916 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2916 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 050 secrets from Secret Submission Post #417.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 (second time) - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
That's interesting... I run an exchange and, from what I've seen, a lot of people feel the same as you.
For me, it doesn't have to be photo-realist, but it does need to tell me something visually truthful about what it's depicting. If (imo) it's badly drawn, I just can't look at it.
no subject
I don't really pay all that much attention to fanart, I guess? And fanart I like can be in a lot of styles, from very, very stylized to photo-realistic.
But no, I don't go for bad fanart as a rule. If it's something really smart, like a clever redesign, it doesn't have be lushly drawn. But bad fanart is mostly just...something from an immature level of artistic development, and really boring?
no subject