[ SECRET POST #2916 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2916 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 050 secrets from Secret Submission Post #417.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 (second time) - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[raspberryrain]

Well, it's more that I don't care that much about fanart as opposed to original art.

I don't really pay all that much attention to fanart, I guess? And fanart I like can be in a lot of styles, from very, very stylized to photo-realistic.

But no, I don't go for bad fanart as a rule. If it's something really smart, like a clever redesign, it doesn't have be lushly drawn. But bad fanart is mostly just...something from an immature level of artistic development, and really boring?

[anonymous4]

I think, maybe, that people assume that if a piece is 'too good' the artist has cheated in some way--which might also explain why some fests exclude photomanips--whereas if something is 'less good' it's obviously all the artist's own work. That's the only way I can make sense of some of the award winners and losers I've seen.