case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-12-29 06:48 pm
  • Add Memory
  • Share This Entry

[ SECRET POST #2918 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2918 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 028 secrets from Secret Submission Post #417.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - random image ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

People who get really serious about their ship being canon

(Anonymous) 2014-12-30 01:06 am (UTC)(link)
WHY DO YOU CARE? It doesn't matter if it's canon or not!

Bonus points if they claim it's queerbaiting.

Re: People who get really serious about their ship being canon

(Anonymous) 2014-12-30 01:22 am (UTC)(link)
+1,
ginainthekingsroad: Withnail in the rain- "I have of late, but wherefore I know not, lost all my mirth" (Withnail & I- Withnail in the rain)

Re: People who get really serious about their ship being canon

[personal profile] ginainthekingsroad 2014-12-30 02:24 am (UTC)(link)
But is it "queebaiting"? :D

Re: People who get really serious about their ship being canon

(Anonymous) 2014-12-30 06:05 am (UTC)(link)
qeerbating?
ginainthekingsroad: a scan of a Victorian fashion plate; a dark haired woman with glasses (me?) (Default)

Re: People who get really serious about their ship being canon

[personal profile] ginainthekingsroad 2014-12-30 07:42 am (UTC)(link)
No, not qeerbating, queebaiting. It's a distinctive typo from a Not Secret that has been posted to F!S at least three times, calling Marceline/Bubblegum "Contrived Shameless Queebaiting." Most recent time was last week, hence I quoted it.

Re: People who get really serious about their ship being canon

(Anonymous) 2014-12-30 08:21 am (UTC)(link)
*whispers* Actually it is qeerbaiting.

http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=2hxbyg3&s=8#.VKI0BSG8HA

Re: People who get really serious about their ship being canon

[personal profile] cbrachyrhynchos 2014-12-30 12:53 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes. Talk about shippers missing the point of shipping.

Re: People who get really serious about their ship being canon

(Anonymous) 2014-12-30 10:30 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, this annoys me, too. Sure I wish my non-canon ships were canon but I just want to change the damn station when all I hear is this tune.

Re: People who get really serious about their ship being canon

(Anonymous) 2014-12-31 08:43 am (UTC)(link)
Because when it does become canon, it's an asspull of a queerbait?
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only