case: ([ Gin; Pretty in white. ])
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2007-12-30 06:16 pm

[ SECRET POST #359 ]


⌈ Secret Post #359 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS. Also, one possibly triggering image!

1.


__________________________________________________



2.


__________________________________________________



3.


__________________________________________________



4.


__________________________________________________



5.


__________________________________________________



6.


__________________________________________________



7.


__________________________________________________



8.


__________________________________________________



9.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.


__________________________________________________



20.


__________________________________________________



21.


__________________________________________________



22.


__________________________________________________



23.


__________________________________________________



24.


__________________________________________________



25.


__________________________________________________



26.


__________________________________________________



27.


__________________________________________________



28.


__________________________________________________



29.


__________________________________________________



30.


__________________________________________________



31.


__________________________________________________



32.


__________________________________________________



33.


__________________________________________________



34.


__________________________________________________



35.


__________________________________________________



36.


__________________________________________________



37.


__________________________________________________



38.


__________________________________________________





Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 10 pages, 240 secrets from Secret Submission Post #052.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 ] broken links, [ 1 2 3 ] not!secrets, [ 1 ] not!fandom, [ 1 2 3 ] repeats, [ 1 2 ] too big, [ 1 ] huh?
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Sunday, December 30th, 2007.
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: 13

[identity profile] moebot.livejournal.com 2007-12-31 05:26 am (UTC)(link)
This entire comment is so, so ridiculous.

Re: 13

[identity profile] sarajayechan.livejournal.com 2007-12-31 05:32 am (UTC)(link)
Okay, I believe we've established here that I am Very Wrong. Now, will you accept my apology and admission that I fucked up, or would you like to punish me with a rant on why I'm So Stupid?

Re: 13

[identity profile] moebot.livejournal.com 2007-12-31 05:39 am (UTC)(link)
No, I am just here to tell you that this comment is ridiculous.

Nice victim complex, though.

Re: 13

[identity profile] sarajayechan.livejournal.com 2007-12-31 05:41 am (UTC)(link)
No, you're wrong. A victim complex would be this:

"FINE! I'm SORRY, okay?! God, why is everyone out to hurt me over a dumb comment?! Just rip my heart out and insult my dad while you're at it, I'll just go sit in a corner and cut myself!!!! /wrist"

What I was doing was called being defensive. See species "puffer fish".

Re: 13

[identity profile] moebot.livejournal.com 2007-12-31 05:50 am (UTC)(link)
You're the one that used the word "punish," homes.

Re: 13

[identity profile] moebot.livejournal.com 2007-12-31 05:54 am (UTC)(link)
I was going to reply to this in all seriousness, but the word "snarky" sends me into blinding fits of irrational rage, so I think I am just going to chill out instead. Hold hands, sing Kumbaya, etc.

Re: 13

[identity profile] moebot.livejournal.com 2007-12-31 06:08 am (UTC)(link)
You don't want to hold hands...? :(

Re: 13

[identity profile] sarajayechan.livejournal.com 2007-12-31 06:10 am (UTC)(link)
You sure you're not gonna rip my arm off while my guard is down? :((((


...oh, okay. XD Your sexy Utena icon won me over.

Re: 13

[identity profile] moebot.livejournal.com 2007-12-31 06:12 am (UTC)(link)
All is going according to plan.
karel: (colette; the better part of me)

Re: 13

[personal profile] karel 2007-12-31 05:34 am (UTC)(link)
Really? Because I've met women like this. One of my sociology professors was a bit, if I might say, frothing at the mouth about it. Quite a few female cops I've met are like this. Many of my classmates have been like this.

Not saying that it has anything to do with the argument, but women like this do exist and it's the minority that can in many cases give the majority a bad name because the minority tends to be more vocal (or at least be heard more) than the majority.

Re: 13

[identity profile] moebot.livejournal.com 2007-12-31 05:48 am (UTC)(link)
I did not say that women like that don't exist. I know they exist. I get ticked off at feminists just as often as I get ticked off as non-feminists, possibly even more! I was just commenting that what [livejournal.com profile] sarajayechan said, on the whole, was ridiculous and ignores the issue of institutionalized sexism, instead focusing on the individual, which does not work in a debate that's been using generalizations so far.

I don't really want to argue this point and get into a whole thing here (then why comment, right?), because while I agree with the argument that's been used against your initial comment, I don't want to contribute to the illegalism pile-on party, since I think you really do mean well. Cheers.

Re: 13

[identity profile] sarajayechan.livejournal.com 2007-12-31 05:52 am (UTC)(link)
Can't we all just admit we've been a bunch of twats and move on with our lives?
karel: (baiken; & she's furious)

Re: 13

[personal profile] karel 2007-12-31 05:53 am (UTC)(link)
*nods* A bit irrelevant (though it is still problematic when women do go out of their way to make males' lives miserable), but several other comments had said that they were few and far between (I'm not sure if it's just my social location, but I run into a good deal of them, perhaps a university thing?), so I thought that was what you were reinforcing.

At any rate (since I don't want to get into a whole thing either, but it seems I did ^^') yeah. And thanks.

Re: 13

[identity profile] moebot.livejournal.com 2007-12-31 06:07 am (UTC)(link)
See, I am completely fascinated by the study of the -isms, so I've persued it at the university level. I'm by no means an expert on things like sexism, racism, homophobia, classism, etc, because seriously, it's just a few classes and essays and textbooks and that does not make me all that knowledgeable (I SWEAR I AM GOING SOMEWHERE WITH THIS I am not trying to be pretentious gsdhfgj sorry). But one of the things that the professors hammer into our heads every class is that the most widely used academic definitions of oppression concern themselves with oppression on an institutional and cultural level, not on a person-by-person basis (so using this definition, "reverse-racism/sexism/classism/whatever" doesn't exist, because oppressed minorities don't have the institutional power to back up their prejudice, whereas a majority person does). This is the definition I am most familiar with. This is not a definition that most people have, but I think it's where a lot of arguments against you are coming from.

Basically what all that nonsense up there means is that I don't want to argue with you because I don't think you accept this definition, or aren't that familiar with it...? I don't mean that as a bad thing, but we're going to see things incredibly differently because of it, making it virtually inpossible to reach a consensus or convince each other of our arguments.

SO TO CONCLUDE (s-sorry for this entire comment btw) I don't see a point in me arguing this with you. I'm only arguing with skippy up there because she is entertaining.
karel: (florina; skyrider)

Re: 13

[personal profile] karel 2007-12-31 06:14 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, I've heard this definition, and it was indeed pounded into my head by the sociology professor I mentioned up there ↑ but I don't think I've got the ground to stand on and engage you in a debate over it because it was just a 101 class. Not to belittle it, but I just probably couldn't follow it, really, and I'm not afraid to admit that.

I don't particularly agree with the thing with "reverse-racism/sexism/etc." but that's just because I'm of the belief that two wrongs =/= a right. I think that both sides are being despicable and wish that things could be resolved... more peacefully, I suppose? Which is idealistic, I know, but I suppose it doesn't keep me from wishing.

However, all of this is a good bit of the reason that I usually don't get involved in discussions of this sort of issues -- especially not over the internet where anonymous can just spam you with "repostrepostrepostrepostrepostrepost" ad infinitum. But anyway, agree to disagree, no hard feelings? ^^'

Re: 13

[identity profile] moebot.livejournal.com 2007-12-31 06:21 am (UTC)(link)
Oh yeah, I'm not going to defend a woman making obviously prejudiced statements about all men, or a gay person making obviously prejudiced statements about all straights, because that's all sorts of wrong and HATE IS BAD NO MATTER WHAT OKAY. I think we can ALL agree on that XD

But yes, we obviously disagree, and that's totally cool. As long as we both understand where the other is coming from, right?
karel: (Default)

Re: 13

[personal profile] karel 2007-12-31 06:24 am (UTC)(link)
And the little girl in me just yells at this point "CAN'T WE ALL JUST GET ALONG ;_;" but I suppose that goes back to my original point of both sides (especially the side doing the oppressing) needing understanding of where the other side is coming from. One of those times when I would be in full favor of a Point of View gun. Marvelous-sounding invention, if you ask me.

Indeed. I respect your point and it sounds valid to me. (: