[ SECRET POST #2926 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2926 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 036 secrets from Secret Submission Post #418.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Hobbit

[philstar22]

The only one who doesn't want to help is Thorin. And the whole point is that he's deep in gold sickness at that point. And then he gets better. There is nothing to suggest that anyone else wouldn't have been willing to help. But Thorin is king, so what he says goes. They don't challenge him because he is their king. Middle Earth is a fantasy-quasi medieval world where royalty is a thing.

Tolkien's characters are flawed. The movie clearly doesn't approve of Thorin not helping the Laketown people.

Re: Hobbit

[cbrachyrhynchos]

I think the worst case of gold sickness was whoever greenlighted a screenplay that missed the point in every possible way. Perhaps the producers were also drowning in that pool of cheese dip.

Re: Hobbit

[philstar22]

Okay? Going to have to agree to disagree on that.

Re: Hobbit

[cbrachyrhynchos]

It's a movie that had Gandalf and Galadriel making moon eyes at each other. You can't get much wronger than that. Except for the other elf romance that ignores what elves are in Tolkien's cosmology and why those relationships only happen once an age. Or perhaps for burying Martin Freeman's strong performance as the title character under nearly two hours of unnecessary effects shots, complications, and cameos that exist only to make a movie release out of three chapters of the book. Or perhaps changing the moral conflict entirely by making Thorin cursed by a glass football, a swimming pool of cheese dip, and Cumberbatch ADR (an asspull of a revision resolved in the movie, apparently, by spreading the curse all over Middle Earth).

Re: Hobbit

[philstar22]

Moon eyes? The trailer certainly made it seemed like they were going that angle, but in the actual movie all I saw was two old friends who cared for each other. Not even a hint of romance.

As for the rest, don't agree at all. I liked it. But I get that a lot of people didn't.

Re: Hobbit

[(Anonymous)]

"Freeman's strong performance"?