Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-01-10 04:16 pm
[ SECRET POST #2929 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2929 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 088 secrets from Secret Submission Post #419.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
That said, it might be productive to look outside of the subgenres of fantasy that are basically defined around massive multi-book epic series. I mean there is such a thing as fantasy that's not epic fantasy or urban noir. Even if those are the most popular subgenres of fantasy right now.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-10 09:54 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-10 11:23 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-11 02:07 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-10 10:14 pm (UTC)(link)Transcript
(Anonymous) 2015-01-10 10:27 pm (UTC)(link)Text: I wish it wasn’t so difficult to find stand-alone fantasy books. It seems like every book I pick up is part of a series.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-10 10:41 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-10 10:46 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-10 10:53 pm (UTC)(link)I guess it's a trend because Tolkien originally did the three-book thing, and then WoT had... what, five, seven books? IDk. And now everyone does it because that's just what you DO in the fantasy genre, apparently.
Stand-alone books are there, they're just a lot less common than all the series.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-11 00:33 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-13 03:15 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-10 23:25 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-11 00:48 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-10 11:03 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-10 11:08 pm (UTC)(link)Yes, I'm looking at you The Thinking Woman's Guide to Real Magic Fuck you and your no-resolution ending.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-11 00:04 (UTC) - Expandno subject
If you do find series that you like that are older, i've found Better World Books to be an awesome resource for old and out of print stuff.
http://www.betterworldbooks.com/
Plus, they're a green company, and they do good in the world.
Recommendations?
(Anonymous) 2015-01-10 11:46 pm (UTC)(link)I can think of some, but they're all YA or kids books.
Re: Recommendations?
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-10 23:59 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Recommendations?
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-11 07:05 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Recommendations?
Does Simmons Apply? (And I have recs)
(Anonymous) 2015-01-10 11:57 pm (UTC)(link)As for fantasy one-offs, if you read urban fantasy, you can eradicate your problem forever. I recommend Charles de Lint, though he sets the majority of his books in Ottawa, they're all (AFAIR) standalones, Neil Gaiman, of course, Stardust, Neverwhere, American Gods, Anansi Boys fit your criteria (might not fit your reading taste, though) also fantasy anthologies are a dime a dozen (literally, you can always pick up one or two in the remainders bins), though if you want quality over quantity, John Shirley's "Black Butterflies" is good. Wide range of stories, all compelling, all fantasy, bordering on horror. Let's see, what else, Butler's "Wild Seed" is good as well (very good, I highly recommend it, in fact) also ticks historical fiction box.
Bradbury, there's lots of fantasy one-offs written by the Grand Master
himself. Though, yeah, you've probably read everything by him, soooo....
*eyeballs bookshelf* OK, Atwood's "A Handmaid's Tale" is more SF, but the setting is very fantasy-ish, as well, at least in the descriptions.
Ah! Connie Willis, "Passage" -- though the subject matter might be too heavy for some (NDEs/death). Pretty straight-up contemp. urban fantasy. The book wasn't my thing (I prefer my Willis zany and breakneck, "Passage" wasn't this at all).
I do feel you, OP, I've a copy of The Great Book of Amber that I got about a hundred pages in, and my brain went, "Nah. Just nah."
Re: Does Simmons Apply? (And I have recs)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-11 03:58 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-11 12:19 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-11 12:35 am (UTC)(link)A recommendation
no subject
http://www.tor.com/blogs/2014/12/standalone-fantasy-novels-part-2
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-11 03:06 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-11 16:12 (UTC) - Expandno subject
I think a lot of series start out with a single stand-alone installation and then just get more books because they sell. Many times, the following books aren't as good. I don't have any recs off the top of my head though (I happen to think WoT is pretty good throughout, for example, but then I like series in general).
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-12 01:43 am (UTC)(link)(I ended up picking Too Many Curses by A. Lee Martinez, and a short story anthology by Patricia C. Wrede. Mom was satisfied.)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-12 01:44 pm (UTC)(link)