[ SECRET POST #2929 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2929 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 088 secrets from Secret Submission Post #419.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: A question to the svelte ladies of F!S

[(Anonymous)]

I'm not a dietician or a diet expert or anything, but I'm not sure that what you're doing makes sense. It seems like (looking through the math there) what you're doing is just trying to set your calorie amount at the necessary daily calorie intake someone at your target weight / height would be using? It probably makes more sense to peg it somewhere between what you need now and what you need at your target weight and then go down from there more gradually. Fucks with your metabolism less, for one thing.

Re: A question to the svelte ladies of F!S

[(Anonymous)]

At my current weight though (127 pounds) my calorie needs are only 1668.9 calories per day. Which is only about 90 calories more than 1580. That's basically a difference of one apple a day. I'm not really sure how to make it more gradual in such a scenario.

Re: A question to the svelte ladies of F!S

[(Anonymous)]

oh whoops I forgot how numbers work and made a bone-headed arithmetic error

MY BAD

Re: A question to the svelte ladies of F!S

[(Anonymous)]

How tall are you? 127 sounds like a great weight to be at, 110 a little bit on the 'too thin' side.

Re: A question to the svelte ladies of F!S

[(Anonymous)]

I'm only 5'2"

At 110 pounds I have a BMI of 20.1

I'm considered overweight once I get over 136 pounds.

I think 110 is probably better personally, especially since I have a small frame (I can wrap my thumb and index finger around my wrist with significant overlap). From what I've read, I should be under 118 pounds with my frame.

Note that I'm not at all muscular (for women who are, they can obviously be heavier and still healthy of course).

Re: A question to the svelte ladies of F!S

[diet_poison]

BMI is...weird, and not always the best measure of your ideal weight.

I'm about 5'3 and my target weight is 130. My current weight is around 160, which is definitely overweight but I don't really appear to be overweight unless you look closely or I wear something super unflattering.

Do you know if you have high bone density or something like that? High density (bone or otherwise, I'm not 100% sure how that works) runs in my family - my dad and I both typically look 20-30 pounds less than we actually weigh.