case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-01-10 04:16 pm

[ SECRET POST #2929 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2929 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 088 secrets from Secret Submission Post #419.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2015-01-11 12:23 am (UTC)(link)
Sexist and racist do carry bigger charges, which is why when something is sexist or racist (or other ists), it's important to call it what it is, rather than hiding behind the bullshit vagueness of "problematic."

(Anonymous) 2015-01-11 07:58 am (UTC)(link)
I use problematic as a blanket term for media with all MANNER of issues. I can say it's sexist and homophobic and apologetic, but when the media has more issues than that, or when I'm talking about an entire genre that is rife with different -isms, I'm gonna call it problematic to keep the conversation from getting too wordy.

You sound like someone who goes out of their way to avoid using "said" when writing dialogue.