case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-01-17 03:26 pm

[ SECRET POST #2936 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2936 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 066 secrets from Secret Submission Post #420.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - text secret ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2015-01-17 09:07 pm (UTC)(link)
The internment of the Japanese to nonlethal camps was very different to the Holocaust. It was in response to the threat to the US from Japan - a much closer analogy to the situation than the genocide and eugenic cleansing attempted by the Nazis.

(Anonymous) 2015-01-17 09:11 pm (UTC)(link)
Eh…the Nazis still sent communists and political dissidents to camps as well. It wasn't just the Jews.

But I see your point.

I just think it's funny that an example from the US was used here.

(Anonymous) 2015-01-17 09:13 pm (UTC)(link)
...yeah okay. Whatever.

(Anonymous) 2015-01-17 09:45 pm (UTC)(link)
You cannot expect to point out anything bad about America and stay intact around here. Fact of F!S life.

(Anonymous) 2015-01-17 09:49 pm (UTC)(link)
That's a ridiculously unfair and loaded way to describe things.

(Anonymous) 2015-01-17 09:57 pm (UTC)(link)
DA

Still true, though.

(Anonymous) 2015-01-17 10:03 pm (UTC)(link)
Okay, maybe, but which controversial political opinions *can* you express on f!s without having someone disagree with you

(Anonymous) 2015-01-17 10:07 pm (UTC)(link)
AYRT

Meh, anything that's supported by the SJ crowd, seems to be beyond reproach. Even though the extremes of SJWism are rejected for the inanity that they are.

(Anonymous) 2015-01-17 10:27 pm (UTC)(link)
Are you kidding me, anything that has to do with SJ is guaranteed to get a dozen smug anons and a group of non-anon users dismissing it as 'LOL TUMBLR!'

[personal profile] philippos42 2015-01-18 01:02 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, as if that was the issue with that post.