[ SECRET POST #2936 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2936 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 066 secrets from Secret Submission Post #420.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - text secret ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

This is so immature of me, but I can't help but be amused that when you're talking about a "dark chapter in European history" and sending people to camps, you bring up the camps for the Japanese in AMERICA as an example.

When there's much more familiar and close to home examples of people being sent to camps for their religion in recent European history.

Sorry -- I know I'm completely missing the point.

[(Anonymous)]

The internment of the Japanese to nonlethal camps was very different to the Holocaust. It was in response to the threat to the US from Japan - a much closer analogy to the situation than the genocide and eugenic cleansing attempted by the Nazis.

[(Anonymous)]

Eh…the Nazis still sent communists and political dissidents to camps as well. It wasn't just the Jews.

But I see your point.

I just think it's funny that an example from the US was used here.

[(Anonymous)]

...yeah okay. Whatever.

[(Anonymous)]

You cannot expect to point out anything bad about America and stay intact around here. Fact of F!S life.

[(Anonymous)]

That's a ridiculously unfair and loaded way to describe things.

[(Anonymous)]

DA

Still true, though.

[(Anonymous)]

Okay, maybe, but which controversial political opinions *can* you express on f!s without having someone disagree with you

[(Anonymous)]

AYRT

Meh, anything that's supported by the SJ crowd, seems to be beyond reproach. Even though the extremes of SJWism are rejected for the inanity that they are.

[(Anonymous)]

Are you kidding me, anything that has to do with SJ is guaranteed to get a dozen smug anons and a group of non-anon users dismissing it as 'LOL TUMBLR!'

[philippos42]

Yeah, as if that was the issue with that post.