[ SECRET POST #2936 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2936 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 066 secrets from Secret Submission Post #420.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - text secret ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Fandom Annoyances

[(Anonymous)]

lol I haaaaate that. I know that people love woobifying their favorite characters, but you can do that without giving them OTT abusive childhoods when it doesn't make sense. I've seen a couple of people in the Teen Wolf fandom write Sheriff Stilinski as this extremely abusive guy who relentlessly bullies poor widdle Stiles and it's hilariously stupid. Fortunately, most of the fandom loves the Sheriff so it happens pretty rarely.

And the Supernatural fandom looooves making John into a cartoonish monster who rapes/beats his children and is drunk like 24/7. Come on, the dude already isn't winning any Father of the Year awards. Why does Sam and Dean's childhood need to be more shitty? They're already good and fucked up.

AYRT

[(Anonymous)]

Usually when it comes to Abusive!characterizations I believe that a character should show SOME signs of it in canon.

Like in the Digimon fandom , while I didn't agree with it, I could sorta see why people wrote Osamu as being that way because one of his big moments in one of the few episodes he appeared in was him being a jerk. I

[Error: Irreparable invalid markup ('<b<>') in entry. Owner must fix manually. Raw contents below.]

Usually when it comes to Abusive!characterizations I believe that a character should show SOME signs of it in canon.

Like in the Digimon fandom , while I didn't <i>agree</i> with it, I could sorta see why people wrote Osamu as being that way because one of his big moments in one of the few episodes he appeared in was him being a jerk. I <b< still</b> think its a dramatic leap and pretty OOC to see a sibling argument and then write him as a maniac who beats his little brother regularly.

Abusive Tadashi Hamada on the other hand? Where the hell are you getting that?

Re: AYRT

[doilycoffin]

Abusive Tadashi Hamada on the other hand? Where the hell are you getting that?

omg yes, this is awful. WHY, FANDOM?