[ SECRET POST #2937 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2937 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 056 secrets from Secret Submission Post #420.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: The Hobbit movie....

[(Anonymous)]

Oh, I definitely wouldn't say laziness is Jackson's problem. I think it's more not having enough time to do the massive amount of cool props, miniatures and on site shooting vs. green screen. Though I'm not sure how much of that is "not enough time" and how much is "poor judgment". There are many cases (in the original trilogy too) where I thought that the decisions were bad ones. I understood why they did it that way and I don't doubt they put a lot of thought into it... but I still felt they were bad, or at least, didn't add anything to the movie. Stuff like "Arwen's life is tied to the riiiiing!", the whole Faramir thing, the addition of a poor and badly used female elf character (when I so wanted her to be awesome), overly long action sequences, Alfrid (ugh), too much CGI work that looks like a computer game, etc.

They tried. I'm glad they tried, but ultimately, the Hobbit movies were so far from what I'd hoped and so far from what they're capable of delivering that it's disappointing.