[ SECRET POST #2939 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2939 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 036 secrets from Secret Submission Post #420.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Jury Duty Advice

[(Anonymous)]

they absolutely do want dumb people on jury duty, or it'd be more accurate to say they don't want smart people. they kicked off every person who'd been to law school when I went (about 3 people), even those people who said aloud they were committed to unbiased decision-making. they were a little -too- educated for their tastes.

Re: Jury Duty Advice

[(Anonymous)]

No, that makes sense to me. Juries aren't supposed to decide questions of law. They're supposed to take the judge's word regarding what the law says and follow his instructions, and if there's a reasonable chance that they can't do that, they probably should be removed.

And moreover I think that system actually kinda makes sense? IDK