Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-01-22 10:26 pm
[ SECRET POST #2941 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2941 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[Assassin's Creed IV: Black Flag]
__________________________________________________
03.

[Fire Emblem: Awakening]
__________________________________________________
04.

[Hannibal, Richard Armitage]
__________________________________________________
05.

[The Hobbit]
__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

[Dan and Mab's Furry Adventures]
__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

[Doctor Who]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 015 secrets from Secret Submission Post #420.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Dragon Age Inquisition thread
(Anonymous) 2015-01-23 01:39 pm (UTC)(link)I agree. I totally get what they were going for, but it was all good intentions but "well meant" is not necessarily the same as "well executed". I would have been cool with "one gender-lock for every sexuality" and have everyone else be game-bisexual because damn it, there's time travel and demons and magic, it doesn't have to be realistic in the romance department. Especially since, in my opinion, the way the sexualities were handled was not done very thoughtfully. Or maybe too thoughfully so much that it seemed like a parody rather than a real thought out matter.
It's not like the LI's would obviously all be bisexual - at least you wouldn't notice it ingame because you play the game with one character/gender at a time.