Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-01-28 10:53 pm
[ SECRET POST #2947 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2947 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

Notes:
Sorry, still at work again.
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 028 secrets from Secret Submission Post #421.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-29 01:05 pm (UTC)(link)I suspect a fair amount of the criticism directed at Uhura is shipping related, but even so my expectations for how a black character was handled in the sixties are always going to be significantly different to how they're handled now a days. Back in the sixties just having a black recurring female character on a show probably was progressive especially if they also occasionally got to do something. Just having a black female character who occasionally gets to do something in your cast isn't progressive in 2000 and whatever so I can see why only marginally developing her a few steps above what she was in the sixties might generate more criticism than her sixties counter-part might have experienced. Expectations are understandably much higher or should be. Having Alice Eve's character strip for no real discernible reason beyond she's hot was also pretty cringe-worthy.
I only started watching the old Star Trek recently and it's hard for me to take seriously the idea that it's set in the 23rd century because of how laughably antiquated the treatment of women's roles seem today. But for the time some of it may have seemed fairly progressive. If they were creating the show now I'd also be a helluva lot more critical if the women weren't much more developed than their sixties counterparts were.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-29 08:43 pm (UTC)(link)For nowadays standards (especially for woc) of how secondary characters are developed, her reboot version is one of the few characters the reboot improved and did better and I have no doubt that some of these people would love her if she did the same things but wasn't in a relationship with Spock and she was single or paired with a character that isn't kirk or spock. Let's call it the way it is. Some people want to have unreasonable standards for the female characters and not just in this fandom. If they get in the way of a slash ship they are doomed.
We all want better female characters and more queer representation but pushing for arbitrary het erasure (ignoring intersectionality and context) or asexual female characters isn't the way.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-29 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)Sorry but that's damn funny -- and I say that as a straight woman of color with WAY less representation than even black women, let alone white women
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-30 09:25 am (UTC)(link)Asexuality also shouldn't be used as an excuse to further marginalize people (woc, queer people) whose sexuality and feelings are already erased and made a bad thing.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-30 03:13 am (UTC)(link)Some people tend to get ugly with characters who get in the way of their ships and no that's not exclusive to slash fandoms as much as people have suddenly decided to pretend otherwise.