Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-01-29 06:52 pm
[ SECRET POST #2948 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2948 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #421.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Het Erasure?
(Anonymous) 2015-01-30 06:51 am (UTC)(link)Yes, if you take over a show / comic / series of any kind, and decide to turn literally every previously established heterosexual Gay or bi with no justification other than "I'm writing this now, and this is the right way to write these characters", then you have just committed something that could be called Het erasure.
However, if you take over a show / comic / series of any kind, and decide to turn some previously established heterosexual Gay or bi with no justification other than "I'm writing this now, and this is the right way to write these characters", then you are probably not committing Het erasure.
The problem with people on both side of the SJW divide is that they see a buzzword and apply it willy-nilly with no thoughts of the actual context.
Re: Het Erasure?