case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-01-31 03:38 pm

[ SECRET POST #2950 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2950 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 065 secrets from Secret Submission Post #422.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: PWP

(Anonymous) 2015-01-31 09:10 pm (UTC)(link)
If a plot revolves around sex but is a plot with character development and all that, then it counts as plot. I would say things like 50 shades of gray have "plot", of whatever quality you deem to give it.

If it's 20k words of "aliens took two of the characters away from all the rest, put them in a cage, and them do it repeatedly over a week with magic sex dust that made them completely OOC," I don't consider that plot, even porny plot. And yes, I've read fics like this.
diet_poison: (Default)

Re: PWP

[personal profile] diet_poison 2015-01-31 09:23 pm (UTC)(link)
I'd agree.

And...wow. How do you put that into 20k words? o__O

Re: PWP

(Anonymous) 2015-01-31 09:26 pm (UTC)(link)
SGA + whump, that's how.
th0rns_n_r0ses: (Default)

Re: PWP

[personal profile] th0rns_n_r0ses 2015-01-31 09:53 pm (UTC)(link)
I think I read that fic.

Re: PWP

(Anonymous) 2015-01-31 09:59 pm (UTC)(link)
There was probably 50+ to choose from, really...

Re: PWP

(Anonymous) 2015-02-01 12:35 am (UTC)(link)
Wonderful.