case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-01-31 03:38 pm

[ SECRET POST #2950 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2950 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 065 secrets from Secret Submission Post #422.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2015-01-31 09:32 pm (UTC)(link)
What is this? What is this thought police?

Like, on the one hand, it's clearly acceptable to say that some kind of thought is, in some sense, wrong. If I think that the earth rotates around the moon, that is wrong and it is valid to say that it's wrong. I mean, is that thought policing? What kind of coherent statement are we trying to make when we say thought police?
insanenoodlyguy: (Default)

[personal profile] insanenoodlyguy 2015-01-31 10:00 pm (UTC)(link)
We are trying to say that telling somebody they are somehow oppressive for simply being attracted to somebody they know won't be attracted to them back is a form of thought policing, and more oppressive then the initial thought could ever be. Even if this insane moron of an idea is somehow correct, the response is in fact the greater evil.

(Anonymous) 2015-01-31 10:03 pm (UTC)(link)
...I cannot believe I am about to type this, but +1, noodles. +1.

(Anonymous) 2015-02-01 04:12 am (UTC)(link)
I have no idea why the hogfather is on f!s

but you arguing with him is hysterical
diet_poison: (Default)

[personal profile] diet_poison 2015-01-31 11:04 pm (UTC)(link)
Well technically someone *thinking* the earth rotates around the moon doesn't harm anyone.

It's kinda like how I approach evolution. I believe it's a thing, but if someone else doesn't and they're not a biologist (or in another scientific field where it really matters) I honestly do not care as long as they're not trying to tell me I'm wrong, a bad Christian, ignorant, etc. - and I'll argue about it 'til the cows come home but only if they want to
Edited 2015-01-31 23:05 (UTC)