Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-02-06 06:55 pm
[ SECRET POST #2956 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2956 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09. [ SPOILERS for Fiddler on the Roof ]

__________________________________________________
10. [ SPOILERS for A Song of Ice and Fire/Game of Thrones]

__________________________________________________
11. [ SPOILERS for Agents of Shield ]

__________________________________________________
12. [ WARNING for abuse ]

__________________________________________________
13. [ WARNING for suicide ]

__________________________________________________
14. [ WARNING for rape ]

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #422.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-07 12:59 am (UTC)(link)Personally, that word can't disappear from the public's tongue soon enough. Sorry, Mr. Twain.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-07 01:18 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-07 01:22 am (UTC)(link)no, you're right. one of the alternate definitions that doesn't involve literally painting something white is "anything, as deceptive words or actions, used to cover up or gloss over faults, errors, or wrongdoings, or absolve a wrongdoer from blame" which makes sense for your secret. I guess the other anon is just upset that language is constantly evolving and changing...it's just what language does
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-07 01:24 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-07 01:29 am (UTC)(link)Hell, it was used that way back in the 1800s. I'm not really sure what the issue is here
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-07 04:11 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-07 10:25 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-07 05:21 pm (UTC)(link)Which makes the most sense, imo.