Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-02-07 04:12 pm
[ SECRET POST #2957 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2957 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 064 secrets from Secret Submission Post #423.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-07 09:27 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-07 09:33 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-07 09:42 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-07 09:46 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-07 09:51 pm (UTC)(link)Actually hang on I forgot he was in League of Gentlemen. Okay maybe this is a problem specific to dramatic contexts for him? IDK
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-07 09:56 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-07 09:59 pm (UTC)(link)I'm saying that Moffat is frustrating because Moffat is really fucking fantastic sometimes and then sometimes really fucking bad
I agree that Gattiss is responsible for the good ship sherlock but when he's bad I'm just like "Whatever" because he's not someone whose writing i would be enthused with to start with. if he fucks up, i have no reaction, unlike with Moffat. except that gattiss was in League of Gentlemen I guess but that seems like a really different thing conceptually.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-07 10:00 pm (UTC)(link)or maybe I shouldn't, for the same reason. A quandary.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-07 10:43 pm (UTC)(link)Well, James' original story is public domain here, so thanks for the indirect recommendation!
no subject
no subject
no subject