[ SECRET POST #2957 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2957 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 064 secrets from Secret Submission Post #423.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[dreemyweird]

I think this is fairly straightforward? It's still a same-sex relationship, just without the sexual component? They're still both homoromantic. The fact that they're also heterosexual has no bearing on what their relationship is called. The only consequence this fact has it that they may experience relationship problems if either or both of them want to have sex on a regular basis.

[(Anonymous)]

Is there a term for homoromantic heterosexual or is it necessarily that longwinded?

[dreemyweird]

As far as I'm aware, no. Mostly because that'd mean that there needs to be a term for EVERY sexual+romantic attraction combination there is, and that's one hell of surplus words to memorize.

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah, it's long. Like I'm Heteroromantic Asexual, but I just normally say I'm hetero because that's easier.

[lb_lee]

I believe the term is 'unlucky.'

(I know of a couple folks with mutually exclusive sexual and romantic orientations. It seems a rough road to me.)

--Rogan