Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-02-07 04:12 pm
[ SECRET POST #2957 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2957 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 064 secrets from Secret Submission Post #423.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-08 12:50 am (UTC)(link)Again, no. This is not logical. You're saying that because all squares are rectangles, all rectangles are therefore squares. That is not true. No one has claimed in this thread that the term romance equals the term sexual attraction. They've said romance by definition includes sexual attraction.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-08 12:57 am (UTC)(link)We're a sexual society, and so many people have trouble with the idea that some people don't want or were never interested in sex, and thus tend to equate them to unfeeling robots who can never know love. Like, literally, can you not see how fucked up that is? Like, no, romance does not need sex or even sexual attraction, and I'm a very sexual person saying that. It's stupid, and needs to change.