[ SECRET POST #2957 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2957 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 064 secrets from Secret Submission Post #423.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

But it doesn't, and I never once assumed that romance has to include sexual attraction. It's another way to shame people who don't want sex as part of their life, another way to other people who aren't sexually attracted to anyone, and another way to feel superior and put asexual or even just people plain not interested in sex down.

We're a sexual society, and so many people have trouble with the idea that some people don't want or were never interested in sex, and thus tend to equate them to unfeeling robots who can never know love. Like, literally, can you not see how fucked up that is? Like, no, romance does not need sex or even sexual attraction, and I'm a very sexual person saying that. It's stupid, and needs to change.