[ SECRET POST #2959 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2959 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.














Notes:

Better early than late!

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 044 secrets from Secret Submission Post #423.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Because the cluebat and the clue-by-four just aren't enough

[dethtoll]

Everyone who is anti-science or uses pseudo-science to justify an unscientific viewpoint -- such as vaxxers, or climate change denialists, or Republicans voting on women's issues.

Re: Because the cluebat and the clue-by-four just aren't enough

[(Anonymous)]

to be fair, the other side is often really guilty of strawmanning, but no one calls them out on it because they're technicallyright

Re: Because the cluebat and the clue-by-four just aren't enough

[dethtoll]

what

Re: Because the cluebat and the clue-by-four just aren't enough

[(Anonymous)]

NAYRT

People arguing in favor of vaccinations or women's rights or what-have-you often make really shitty arguments in favor of those views, but it's easy to overlook because they happen to be arguing in favor of the correct side.