case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-02-10 07:00 pm

[ SECRET POST #2960 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2960 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.














Notes:

Better early than late!

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 034 secrets from Secret Submission Post #423.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2015-02-11 12:55 am (UTC)(link)
It's the job of a writer to create rich and varied characters with differing outlooks and opinions. If all the characters the writer creates have the same outlooks and views on life and society them it might be that either the writer is projecting their personal povs onto the characters. Or perhaps they are just limited. Then your hypothesis might have merit.
sarillia: (Default)

[personal profile] sarillia 2015-02-11 01:07 am (UTC)(link)
I don't think it's that simple. There can be varied outlooks but a sense that the author thinks one of them is right and the rest are wrong. I don't really understand where the assumption that all the characters have to think the same way for any of them to be authorial mouthpieces comes from.