Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-02-17 06:58 pm
[ SECRET POST #2967 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2967 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 034 secrets from Secret Submission Post #424.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets (also too big anyway) ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

OP here!
(Anonymous) 2015-02-18 01:27 am (UTC)(link)I actually have a far bigger issue with works that just copy genres and setups entirely even if they are original than works that are adapted fanfic. Let's say someone does a zombie novel and it's super good, then someone else does a zombie novel in the exact same vein that's mostly paraphrased but isn't 'fanfic' because it's new characters! Copycat novels, basically, those I have a huge beef with and do not like. But the core of Twilight isn't really much like 50 Shades and vice versa, so that's no biggie to me.
And for behaviour, I'm the same as that as I am at Orson Scott Card. I don't have to like them to enjoy reading what they write, and I don't like them more because I enjoyed what they write. If I like a piece of work, it's because of what it's about and how it's written and not who did it.