Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-02-24 07:02 pm
[ SECRET POST #2974 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2974 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 044 secrets from Secret Submission Post #425.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Fandom rant thread
(Anonymous) 2015-02-25 01:06 am (UTC)(link)Re: Fandom rant thread
(Anonymous) 2015-02-25 01:12 am (UTC)(link)If they were well written explorations of the issues surrounding those themes, then yes. Okay. I could get behind that. Invariably, however, they're not. Instead, they're almost universally trashy, borderline exploitative crap where either the author uses the character to espouse their own opinions, or the subject at hand is used as a cheap way to hook up X with character Y.
Re: Fandom rant thread
(Anonymous) 2015-02-25 01:15 am (UTC)(link)Well written should read 'well thought out'. Scusi. It's late here.
Re: Fandom rant thread
(Anonymous) 2015-02-25 01:20 am (UTC)(link)Sad nonny is sad.
Re: Fandom rant thread
(Anonymous) 2015-02-25 01:22 am (UTC)(link)Re: Fandom rant thread
(Anonymous) 2015-02-25 01:24 am (UTC)(link)Re: Fandom rant thread
But honestly, I don't even get sad when characters die anymore. It is like, "Well of course they were going to die. It's an HBO show. So fucking what."
At this point, I get more emotional over a character surviving a season.
Re: Fandom rant thread
(Anonymous) 2015-02-25 01:50 am (UTC)(link)HBO have ramped up the shock value in their shows to the point where it has no impact anymore, I guess.
Re: Fandom rant thread
Re: Fandom rant thread
(Anonymous) 2015-02-25 02:08 am (UTC)(link)Re: Fandom rant thread
Re: Fandom rant thread
(Anonymous) 2015-02-25 02:09 am (UTC)(link)At least they didn't kill off Rust on True Detective. I was ready to throw my TV out the window old-skool style if they did.
Re: Fandom rant thread
Re: Fandom rant thread
(Anonymous) 2015-02-25 04:58 am (UTC)(link)FRANK SOBOTKA WAS MY SPIRIT ANIMAL
Re: Fandom rant thread
Re: Fandom rant thread
(Anonymous) 2015-02-25 02:12 am (UTC)(link)Death definitely starts to have less of an impact when it happens constantly. I was surprised the last TWD death (or the last one I saw, I am two eps behind) made me sad because even though I like the character, I'm just caring less and less.
Like if they really want to shock us they should lull us into a false sense of security for a while and then kill a bunch of characters at once.
Re: Fandom rant thread
Re: Fandom rant thread
The only people I feel mildly bad about blocking are the RPers. They seem like nice people but they just clutter the tags.
Re: Fandom rant thread
Yes, there's implications, in certain situations, but this is a fucking doll owner who was messing around with HER FUCKING DOLL. She didn't hold a goddamn gun to the tags collective heads and nake THEM do that. Piss off tag. Ugh.
Re: Fandom rant thread