[ SECRET POST #2976 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2976 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.
[Homestuck]


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.
[NCIS: Los Angeles/Hawaii Five-0]


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.
[Left Shark (Katy Perry? Super Bowl?) and Bad-Dragon .com]


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.
[hindsight]









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 016 secrets from Secret Submission Post #425.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[case]

Name the fandom. And repeats, etc.

[(Anonymous)]

Case, I want to preface this I don't want to attract wank by bringing this up. I really hope that any other persons commenting here react respectfully!

I was looking at F!S's community profile yesterday and was struck by part of it:
6. Anonymous comments on secret posts are allowed and IP addresses will not be logged, but personal attacks will not be tolerated. If you make a secret saying that Harry Potter fans annoy you, that's fine. If you make one naming a specific author in Harry Potter fandom and ripping into her as a person, that is not fine. If a user is caught making this kind of attack, a warning will be issued once. Upon a second incident, the user will be permanently banned.

Okay, that makes sense. But that's not actually what happens here. 1.) Perhaps this should be rephrased to reflect that IP logging is not usually on. And 2.) Why the hell aren't there warnings and bans for our persistent troublemakers? Specifically the ones who go after named users in the worst way, but just in general.

I just wish that either you followed the ground rules stated in your own policy, or you rewrote your rules on the profile page to reflect what actually takes place here. Because it is inconsistent. The profile IS very out of date-- NONE of the linked affiliate communities have had any activity since 2011 or before (2008-9 for most), many with mods with deleted journals, etc.

I guess you can delete/freeze/ignore this as you see fit.

[case]

You're right, I should update that! Brb, doing so!

Also, to address #2 - pretty much all those persistent troublemakers are anon.

[(Anonymous)]

Go back to Mark Reads, you twat.

[(Anonymous)]

Don't hate on someone because they're pointing something out in the rules. Jeez.

[(Anonymous)]

I feel a little bad about it, but I'm always a little bit happy to see someone who shares my disdain for MR/MW

[(Anonymous)]

Case is such a tyrant, yada yada. Yawn.

[(Anonymous)]

Did they say that? No. They asked about the stated rules not reflecting case's current operating procedure, because he was probably unaware of that (those rules go way back into LJ days).

No Transcript Anon This Weekend

[(Anonymous)]

I'm not sure if this is the place for it, if it's not I'm sorry, but I'm going to be away from my computer this weekend, so I thought I would give a heads up in case somebody else wanted to do it?

Re: No Transcript Anon This Weekend

[(Anonymous)]

I can't guarantee to always be online when the post goes up, but if I see that no one has done the transcripts yet when I do come online, I'll handle it.

So have a guilt-free weekend, transcript anon! Thanks for the lovely labor you do every day. :)