[ SECRET POST #2976 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2976 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.
[Homestuck]


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.
[NCIS: Los Angeles/Hawaii Five-0]


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.
[Left Shark (Katy Perry? Super Bowl?) and Bad-Dragon .com]


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.
[hindsight]









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 016 secrets from Secret Submission Post #425.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?

[diet_poison]

er, I'm not sure how you're using the word "love" here, but romantic attraction doesn't always extend to that degree?

(maybe I'm just being really pedantic)

Re: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?

[kallanda_lee]

Nah what I meant was: Sex without romantic feeling or love has always been fairly common.

But I can't imagine that (if you are sexual) being romantically attracted and:or in love, without wanting to also be physical with that person, is in fact very common.

If that makes sense.

Re: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?

[(Anonymous)]

But I can't imagine that (if you are sexual) being romantically attracted and:or in love, without wanting to also be physical with that person, is in fact very common.

I can't imagine that, either. For asexuals I totally get it, but when you're not asexual, it doesn't really make sense.

Re: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?

[diet_poison]

Nah, that makes sense. And no, I don't think it's very common (if you're sexual) though who is to say it never happens? /shrug

Re: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?

[mimi-sardinia.livejournal.com]

Now that I think I get what you are saying I personally think that no, it's not common.

I do think it is possible though. Just uncommon.