[ SECRET POST #2979 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2979 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16. [repeat]













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 091 secrets from Secret Submission Post #426.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

It was more the issue with the Bat sonar that I was thinking of...

[(Anonymous)]

What the realization that while total surveillance can be useful in the most extreme of emergencies, that even then it was a temptation that no man should have and ought to be shut down? That is the message the film put out. No justifying ongoing surveillance by claiming the emergency still was ongoing, no trying to leverage it into a "trust me I won't abuse it", Bruce put it in the hands of someone else and that someone shut it down hard. The message was that freedom and privacy is something no one should be expected to give up and anyone who advocated otherwise was mentally unstable.

[(Anonymous)]

That might have been the intention but combine it with the subsequent film and it doesn't read to me that way at all

instead, it sounds like an "ends justify the means scenario"

especially since the next film portrays all of Gotham as completely incompetent without Batman

It's an INCREDIBLY paternalistic story

[(Anonymous)]

Oh, well, I didn't bother with the third movie. I'd kinda grown out of my grimdark phase when it rolled around.

[(Anonymous)]

If that's your takeaway then it sounds more left leaning than republican. They actually do the things the right gets blamed for.

[(Anonymous)]

Assuming you mean that they do the authoritarian paternalistic things [that the right gets blamed for] - that doesn't make it leftist at all, because it portrays those authoritarian things as basically correct and justified.