Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-03-20 07:02 pm
[ SECRET POST #2998 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2998 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11. [repeat]
__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
19.

__________________________________________________
20.

__________________________________________________
21.

__________________________________________________
22.

__________________________________________________
23.

__________________________________________________
24.

__________________________________________________
25.

__________________________________________________
26.

__________________________________________________
27. http://i.imgur.com/1PIv5hG.jpg
[Archer, linked for cartoon nudity/sex]
__________________________________________________
28.

__________________________________________________
29.

__________________________________________________
30. [ SPOILERS for Kingsman ]

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #428.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

TWs
(Anonymous) 2015-03-21 01:02 am (UTC)(link)Even when the secret isn't triggery itself the comments get triggery real fast, partly because one or two trolls go out of their way to trigger people.
A bunch of trolls and other people will probably jump on me for this and call me over-sensitive. Well whatever, I'm not in the least ashamed of having mental health problems. Like a lot of people I come to fandom for fun and escapism (as well as meta and discussion), not to make myself want to start peeling my skin off.
I'm NOT saying people shouldn't say whatever they feel about issues here, I'd just really appreciate if they were down at the bottom and less in my face.
Thanks for considering it whatever you decide, Case.
(I'm not going to read anon replies because I don't have enough fucking valium for it.)
A Serious Question About A Potential Stumbling Block
(Anonymous) 2015-03-21 01:06 am (UTC)(link)The problem is that at least, as it stands, all warnings are on the submitter's side. As we've seen in previous arguments about spoilers, Case doesn't make any decision about which secrets merit a warning; he just uses the ones that submitters provide.
Do you have any ideas for how this could be accomplished? Maybe linking SJ-type secrets, like is presently done with NSFW secrets?
Re: A Serious Question About A Potential Stumbling Block
(Anonymous) 2015-03-21 01:10 am (UTC)(link)Personally if he just moved them to the end of the post (not necessarily adding a TW - before the TW & spoilers would work), that'd be fine for me. It's often not the text of the secret itself, but the huge flow of discussion (and things like clicking wrong when trying to scroll past and seeing things I really, really wish I hadn't).
Re: A Serious Question About A Potential Stumbling Block
(Anonymous) 2015-03-21 01:21 am (UTC)(link)Problem: TW & spoilers are only on fridays. That would mean moving every social justice secret to friday.
Problem: like spoilers, how does case know what is a social justice issue and what isn't when it's not obvious?
Re: A Serious Question About A Potential Stumbling Block
(Anonymous) 2015-03-21 01:24 am (UTC)(link)I do think it's a lot easier to figure out what secrets are SJW-y than what secrets are spoiler-y, but I would understand if Case wasn't willing to do it.
Re: A Serious Question About A Potential Stumbling Block
(Anonymous) 2015-03-21 01:27 am (UTC)(link)Hrm, if they mention white people or something like that it's easy. If the secret had only been about boycotting Agent Carter, someone like me would have had no clue if that was social justice related or not b/c I don't follow that fandom.
Does Jeremy Clarkson wank count as social justice?
Re: A Serious Question About A Potential Stumbling Block
(Anonymous) 2015-03-21 01:31 am (UTC)(link)idk about Clarkson though, lol. I like OP's idea but I would be sad if all the Clarkson wank secrets were confined to Fridays ;)
another DA
(Anonymous) 2015-03-21 01:28 am (UTC)(link)1. Would that be a big problem? How many social justice secrets are there? IDK, it seems like a bonus to me, keep all the wank on one day, but could be a problem if it's a particularly big issue one week (and when shows like Doctor Who are running, I can see how that could happen!).
2. If it isn't obvious, it isn't obvious and he can't be blamed for not spotting it. When they outright talk about SJWs or it's about arguments around feminism, racism, "cis scum" and all that, I think I trust Case to figure it out.
Re: another DA
(Anonymous) 2015-03-21 01:32 am (UTC)(link)My worry is that fridays will become social justice, spoilers, and triggers day and made of wank and serious business. If there are 10 social justice secrets per week that would mean half the post is social justice and the rest is triggers. Blegh.
Re: another DA
(Anonymous) 2015-03-21 01:36 am (UTC)(link)What if it was just moving them to the bottom of whichever post they're already in?
Re: another DA
(Anonymous) 2015-03-21 01:51 am (UTC)(link)I''m in favor of this.
* yet another anon
ada
(Anonymous) 2015-03-21 01:37 am (UTC)(link)- another different anon
Re: A Serious Question About A Potential Stumbling Block
(Anonymous) 2015-03-21 02:41 am (UTC)(link)Re: A Serious Question About A Potential Stumbling Block
(Anonymous) 2015-03-21 04:33 am (UTC)(link)Re: A Serious Question About A Potential Stumbling Block
(Anonymous) 2015-03-21 05:40 am (UTC)(link)Re: A Serious Question About A Potential Stumbling Block
(Anonymous) 2015-03-21 11:53 am (UTC)(link)Re: A Serious Question About A Potential Stumbling Block
(Anonymous) - 2015-03-21 17:22 (UTC) - Expandsupporting this idea
(Anonymous) 2015-03-21 01:19 am (UTC)(link)Re: TWs
Re: TWs
(Anonymous) 2015-03-21 01:45 am (UTC)(link)I agree it's sometimes going to be very subjective, but even if Case moved only the outright obvious to the bottom of the page it'd be helpful to some people. I'm curious to see how this discussion goes to get an idea of how many.
Re: TWs
(Anonymous) 2015-03-21 02:02 am (UTC)(link)It doesn't have to be perfect, it doesn't have to even be an announced policy, but if it's not TOO much extra work for Case, I'm one of those who'd be v grateful.
Re: TWs
(Anonymous) 2015-03-21 02:27 am (UTC)(link)Re: TWs
(Anonymous) 2015-03-21 04:31 am (UTC)(link)Re: TWs
(Anonymous) 2015-03-21 04:07 am (UTC)(link)Re: TWs
(Anonymous) 2015-03-21 04:30 am (UTC)(link)Re: TWs
(Anonymous) 2015-03-21 03:00 pm (UTC)(link)And fuck people who think "being triggered" and "feeling bad" are the same thing. Fuck them in the eye with a screwdriver.