[ SECRET POST #3002 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3002 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.
[Transformers: More than Meets the Eye/Transformers: Robots in Disguise]


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.
[Gary Barlow, Take That]


__________________________________________________



11.
[Sherlock Holmes]


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.
[Criminal Minds/Law and Order: SVU]


__________________________________________________



15.
[Gekkan shoujo Nozaki-kun]


__________________________________________________



16.
[Buffy the Vampire Slayer (episode: Prom Night)]


__________________________________________________



17.
[Breaking Bad]


__________________________________________________



18.
[Night Shift]


__________________________________________________



19.
[Neil Patrick Harris, Stephen Fry, Neil Gaiman, Stephen Colbert]


__________________________________________________



20.
[clockwise from bottom left: Dinosaur Comics, Romantically Apocalyptic, Homestuck, Nedroid, Sfeer Theory, Bite Me!]


__________________________________________________



21.
[Dragon Age]









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 066 secrets from Secret Submission Post #429.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

The process of localization is part of the translation process, so British books being Americanized count as a translation, same for the opposite. Maybe that's what OP means?

[(Anonymous)]

AYRT

I've never known an American book be Anglicized. If it's set in the US then it's using US terms/locations/references. There's a presumption in the media that we'll recognize American references (stores, brands etc.) without the need to change it.

Do British books really get Americanized to the point where they change the terms (like above, "Mom" for "Mum", etc.) and locations?

[(Anonymous)]

I'm reading an American book at the moment, a crime novel that was republished over here in a British edition.

The punctuation has been changed to the British style. Otherwise, it still uses American spelling and cultural references: "color", "trash can" and so on.

I heard that Harry Potter was republished in the US with American spelling, but don't know if that was an urban myth as that just seems weird. Although that's a book for children so it's a slightly different case.

[vethica]

Am American, can confirm. Harry Potter was very localized in the early books.

[(Anonymous)]

So did a very British Harry Potter in that edition talk about his "mom" and dad?

If the OP has grown up with that sort of thing, it's more understandable why even the concept of Britpicking would fill them with confusion.

[vethica]

I think "mom" was used for "mum" in the first printing or so until Rowling put her foot down ("Molly Weasley is not a mom"). Stuff like "jumper" -> "sweater" and "trainers" -> "sneakers" was still going on several books in, though.

[(Anonymous)]

AYRT

That's always been my experience too. I personally wouldn't even notice the switch in punctuation styles, because I read so widely that by now I just adjust automatically. Like "color" etc., " " vs. ' ' isn't exactly something that makes me stop reading because I don't understand.

Changing that much of a book that's in the same language just smacks of unnecessary dumbing down. Are we really saying that given the context, American kids can't grasp that "Mum" is the same as "Mom"? I heard that they changed the titles because they (the US publishers) thought that US kids wouldn't know enough about mythology to understand things like "Philosopher's Stone", which is also pretty insulting if it's true.

[(Anonymous)]

They did. The assumption was that "philosopher's stone" wouldn't translate as something magical to the mind of an American child, and without the context of "philosopher's stone" being a magical item, philosopher would = boring, whereas sorcerer would = exciting.