[ SECRET POST #3030 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3030 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 051 secrets from Secret Submission Post #433.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[fingalsanteater]

Mmm, yeah. I do enjoy self-deprecating humor (which is what I consider "trash" posts to be), so I see your point. Really, I'm in the middle on this one because I understand both sides.

But, self-deprecation can be used as a way to minimize your involvement in something to protect against internal and external flak like "you shouldn't enjoy this thing because of reasons," and that's part of what op takes issue with. I actually do that exact thing, but I don't call myself trash. (I think may be more the terminology than anything. Trash has very negative connotations and sounds rather childish.) It's not that people can't make fun of themselves, it's the blatant dismissal of the things they like because they feel they shouldn't be enjoying them. And that can be a damaging mindset, that your interests are not worthwhile because they are cheesy or low-budget or soap-operatic or cartoons or whatever.

[(Anonymous)]

I can't agree that it's always a blatant dismissal of something someone likes, especially since "trash" has caught on with fandom I've seen it used in a variety of contexts.

I still think it's a bit creepy to tell someone exactly how they are allowed to make fun of themselves. If it's a friend and it's something you're legitimately concerned about, that's one thing, but if someone is just dorking around fandom why is it any of OP's or anyone else's business how they have fun?

OP can easily learn to scroll, and like with anything in fandom, I'm sure the word "trash" will eventually become uncool and you won't see it as slang as much anymore.

[(Anonymous)]

"it's the blatant dismissal of the things they like because they feel they shouldn't be enjoying them"

If that's the context you've seen it in, then that's the context you've seen it in, but in my experience the people calling themselves Whatever-trash are some of the most vocal and proud fans of the thing they're calling trash.

For one of my fandoms where the phrase has caught on intensely, for the people using it (especially in terms of the ships they like) there's absolutely no dismissal involved. These are unequivocal fans of the thing they're calling trash. Some of them are BNFs for the fandom and the pairing and defend both passionately.

I wouldn't even say they use it in a self-depreciating context, at least not in terms of the medium/fandom/ship. They're vocal and proud of their likes. Rather, it seems like they're calling themselves trash humorously/ironically for being so affected by the thing they like (the same way people call the characters they love losers, assholes, bastards, etc. because they have such an impact on you), but I never get the sense that they're ashamed of liking it.