Case (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
case) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
fandomsecrets2015-04-25 03:59 pm
case) wrote in fandomsecrets2015-04-25 03:59 pm
[ SECRET POST #3034 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3034 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.
__________________________________________________
02.
__________________________________________________
03.
__________________________________________________
04.
__________________________________________________
05.
__________________________________________________
06.
__________________________________________________
07.
__________________________________________________
08.
__________________________________________________
09.
__________________________________________________
10.
__________________________________________________
11.
__________________________________________________
12.
__________________________________________________
13.
__________________________________________________
14.
__________________________________________________
15.
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 096 secrets from Secret Submission Post #434.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-04-26 11:51 am (UTC)(link)no subject
Anyway, I'm not sure how I'd answer that. I'm arguing with Herpy's interpretation of Philstar's words, and can see both sides of the argument Philstar's making. If I had to give an answer right now, though, to go on a bit of a tangent - that specific issue isn't misandry, no. It's not an attitude that applies to men in general; it's tearing down specific men who don't fit the paradigm of what a man "should be". It's definitely harmful and bad and a result of gender role crap, but I do not think I'd call it misandry, specifically.